Does the authorized body for internal state audit consider complaints about actions (omissions), decisions of the customer, organizer, or a single organizer?
In accordance with paragraphs 589, 590 and 599 of the Public Procurement Regulations, a complaint about actions (omissions), the decision of the customer, organizer, unified organizer, expert commission (expert) is submitted via the web portal to the address of the customer, organizer, unified organizer, adopted the relevant protocol on the results of public procurement.
The complaint is considered by the structural division or official of the client, organizer, joint organizer, responsible for addressing complaints within the stated requirements (arguments).
A complaint lodged after the expiry of the time limit provided for in paragraph 588 of the Regulation shall not be considered.
It should also be noted that, in accordance with paragraph 6 of the Rules for the Conduct of Camperlike Control (hereinafter referred to as the Rules), the detection of irregularities during the conduct of camperlike control is carried out in accordance with the list of risk profiles for camperlike control, as shown in Annex 1 to this Regulation.
In turn, according to annex 1 of the Rules, there is no risk profile for a decision on admission or rejection of a potential supplier, as well as improper application of conditional discounts in violation of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on state procurement.
Thus, given that the current legislation on public procurement establishes a procedure for dealing with complaints from potential suppliers regarding the outcome of public procurement, we would like to point out the need to refer to the above-mentioned paragraphs of the Rules governing the conduct of public procurement.
It should be noted that, in accordance with article 25, paragraph 3, of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On State Procurement," the decision of the client, organizer, and joint organizer adopted following the review of the complaint, may be appealed to a court in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Are complaints from potential suppliers about unsubstantiated requirements of the tender documents by customers that were filed after the time limits for desk checks have expired to be considered?
In accordance with paragraph 17 of the Rules for the Conduct of Departmental Control, approved by the order of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 30 November 2015, 598, departmental control of public procurement is carried out through a competitive proces...
What measures does the authorized body for internal public audit apply when it is established that a potential supplier has provided incorrect information?
In accordance with subparagraph (1) of article 3 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On public procurement" (hereinafter - the Law), false information - false information contained in the application for participation in the tender, auction and supporting documents of a pot...
Is it possible to restore the status of a terminated public procurement contract on the web portal for public procurement?
Regarding the restoration of the status of a terminated public procurement contract on the web portal for public procurement, we clarify that according to article 3, paragraph 21, of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On State Procurement", a public procurement contract is a...
How can I appeal the decision of an authorized body on the results of a desk control in the area of public procurement?
In case of disagreement with the decision of the agency of the authorized body and (or) the decision of the territorial division, the potential supplier has the right to appeal this decision by filing a complaint in the form provided for in annex 6 to the Rules for the conduct of...
When and where is an objection to the audit object filed if it does not agree with the results of the audit?
In the event of disagreement with the results of an audit, pursuant to subparagraph (1) of paragraph 1 of article 58-2 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On state audit and financial control", the objection to the object of the state audit is filed with the appeal commissi...
Does the body responsible for internal public audit have the authority to call upon experts to carry out audit activities, what is the purpose of their engagement and who pays for their services?
The agency and its territorial subdivisions within their powers, in order to carry out the tasks assigned to them, In accordance with paragraph 59 of the Rules for the Conduct of Internal State Audit and Financial Control, shall attract relevant experts by including them in the g...
What actions does the authorized body for internal state audit take in case of complaints about the actions of Customers under concluded public procurement contracts (late payment for delivered goods, service rendered, work performed; refusal to accept the delivered goods, etc.)?
In accordance with subparagraph 21) of article 3 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On State Procurement" (hereinafter - the Law), a contract on state procurement is a civil-legal agreement concluded through a web portal between the customer and the supplier, authenticated...
What is the procedure for dealing with complaints of disagreement with the public procurement results protocol?
In accordance with paragraphs 589, 590 of the "Rules for the Conduct of Public Procurement," a complaint about actions (omissions), the decision of the customer, organizer, unified organizer, expert commission (expert) is submitted via the web portal to the address of the custome...
